In 1980, the Hunt brothers tried to corner the silver market.
They accumulated physical metal for years, watching the price climb from $6 to nearly $50 per ounce.
Then the exchange changed the rules mid-game — raising margin requirements, restricting new positions, allowing liquidation-only trading.
What happened next?
Silver collapsed 50% in four days.
The Hunts had bet everything on controlling physical supply, but they forgot that markets can change the rules when concentrated positions threaten the system. They lost over a billion dollars, and it took them a decade to unwind the mess.
Now fast forward to this month, and we’re seeing central banks doing what the Hunts couldn’t — accumulating gold systematically, transparently, and without breaking any rules.
And gold? Prices recently broke above $5,200 per ounce, just as J.P. Morgan raised its year-end target to $6,300.
Except, their bullish case now stretches to $8,500 if household allocations rise just 1.6%.
Of course, the difference between the Hunts and today’s gold buyers is simple: these central banks aren’t gambling on a squeeze.
They’re building against a system they no longer trust.

Why Gold Works When Everything Else Breaks
You know that old rule about gold and interest rates moving in opposite directions?
Well, it died in 2022.
In fact, gold surged over 150% as rates climbed from near-zero to over 5%. The inverse correlation that governed 50 years of market behavior just… stopped working.
And Wall Street is still trying to explain it.
Apollo’s Chief Economist Torsten Slok called it “weird.” Goldman Sachs quietly updated their models, and J.P. Morgan upped its gold price forecast to $6,300 by year-end 2026, with long-term forecasts raised 15% to $4,500 per ounce.
So what changed? For starters, investors stopped trusting bonds to do their job.
The Best Free Investment You’ll Ever Make
Our analysts have traveled the world over, dedicated to finding the best and most profitable investments in the global energy markets. All you have to do to join our Energy and Capital investment community is sign up for the daily newsletter below.
When inflation hit 9% in 2022, conventional 60/40 portfolios got hammered from both sides. Bonds were supposed to hedge equities, after all. The problem is that they ended up falling in tandem as stock-bond correlations hit 30-year highs.
Gold, meanwhile, did exactly what it was supposed to do — it held value while paper assets burned.
The thing is, inflation has “receded” to 2.7%.
However, that’s still above the Fed’s 2% target, and more importantly, everyone from Ray Dalio to institutional treasury managers now assumes 3% inflation is the new baseline.
That might not sound like much, but compounded over a decade, 3% annual inflation erodes purchasing power by 26%.
Look, you’re either protecting against that erosion, or you’re not.
And central banks have made their choice clear thus far, and are expected to buy 800 tonnes this year — that’s double the pre-2022 average of 400-500 tonnes annually.
Let’s look at who’s buying and why:
Poland: 543 tonnes accumulated (28% of reserves), targeting 30% allocation. They’re not stopping.
China: 18 consecutive months of buying, total reserves now exceed 2,300 tonnes. The People’s Bank hasn’t paused since mid-2023.
Brazil: Added 43 tonnes in three months after a two-year break. The return signals renewed conviction in gold’s role.
India: Cultural demand layered with modern ETF adoption. Assets under management in gold ETFs hit $14.2 billion by the end of 2025.
So why the acceleration?
Well, de-dollarization isn’t a conspiracy theory anymore — it’s shifted into policy.
When Russia’s foreign reserves got frozen in 2022, that was the wake-up call heard in every finance ministry from Beijing to Brasília.
It said that gold can’t be sanctioned or frozen… and it certainly doesn’t require permission to access.
J.P. Morgan’s math is straightforward. Their base case forecast of $6,300 assumes central banks maintain current buying pace and household allocations edge up modestly from 3% to 4.6%.
That modest shift — just 1.6% — would push prices to $8,000-$8,500!
I know the veteran members of our investment community — particularly the lifelong gold bugs among us — that prices surged in the 1970s when government spending and central bank credibility collapsed.
Then, it jumped again in 2022 when Russia cut gas to Europe and inflation spiked.
The pattern seems pretty consistent — when systemic risks materialize, gold wins every time.
But here’s what most people haven’t caught onto yet…
We’re not looking at a crisis spike, but rather a peek at how portfolio construction is changing permanently.
You see, the 60/40 portfolio assumed bonds would hedge equity risk. That assumption died the moment Russian tanks started rolling over Ukrainian soil.
Now institutional investors are building portfolios with 5-15% gold allocations as permanent ballast, not opportunistic trades.
When tensions with Iran started ratcheting higher recently, gold climbed as THE safe-haven asset. Yet, it held those gains even as geopolitical noise faded.
In other words, we weren’t looking at fear buying, but structural demand absorbing supply.
Makes sense, right?
Gold Just Broke $5,200 — Here’s What Comes Next
Look, the headlines will tell you gold at $5,200 is already a remarkable run.
Don’t get me wrong — it is.
But framing this as a “run” misses the point entirely.
You see, what’s happening in 2026 isn’t a simple momentum trade, it’s a fundamental repricing of what safety means. And that repricing has years — possibly decades — left to play out.
Think about where the pressure is coming from. You’ve got sovereign buyers who aren’t going anywhere, an inflation baseline that’s been permanently reset higher, and a bond market that burned the people who trusted it most.
Of course, you can’t forget a generation of institutional portfolio managers who will never again assume a 60/40 allocation is sufficient protection.
That’s the part most people miss.
And every single one of those forces is still in motion, and none of them are likely to reverse in 2026.
J.P. Morgan’s $6,300 year-end target doesn’t seem like such a wild-eyed prediction anymore, does it?
Perhaps it’s closer to a conservative extrapolation of trends already firmly in place.
As for their $8,500/oz bull case? Well, that only requires households to nudge their gold allocation by 1.6%.
In a world of persistent inflation and geopolitical instability, that’s not a stretch — it feels more like inevitability.
Gold is no longer a fear trade, it’s become a trade of conviction.
The Hunt brothers tried to manufacture a gold-like moment in silver — and failed spectacularly.
The central banks of Poland, China, Brazil, and India aren’t manufacturing anything.
They’re simply reading the room.
Gold’s march higher has just begun.
Until next time,

Keith Kohl
A true insider in the technology and energy markets, Keith’s research has helped everyday investors capitalize from the rapid adoption of new technology trends and energy transitions. Keith connects with hundreds of thousands of readers as the Managing Editor of Energy & Capital, as well as the investment director of Angel Publishing’s Energy Investor and Technology and Opportunity.
For nearly two decades, Keith has been providing in-depth coverage of the hottest investment trends before they go mainstream — from the shale oil and gas boom in the United States to the red-hot EV revolution currently underway. Keith and his readers have banked hundreds of winning trades on the 5G rollout and on key advancements in robotics and AI technology.
Keith’s keen trading acumen and investment research also extend all the way into the complex biotech sector, where he and his readers take advantage of the newest and most groundbreaking medical therapies being developed by nearly 1,000 biotech companies. His network includes hundreds of experts, from M.D.s and Ph.D.s to lab scientists grinding out the latest medical technology and treatments. You can join his vast investment community and target the most profitable biotech stocks in Keith’s Topline Trader advisory newsletter.

